Dianna Agron
Junior Member
I'm not lonely when I'm alone
Posts: 56
|
Post by Dianna Agron on Mar 13, 2012 5:20:20 GMT -7
I'm not confident this week at all. So here's my photo High Fashion  Commercial  |
|
|
|
Post by Lana Del Ray on Mar 13, 2012 6:00:54 GMT -7
Lana: For you HF shoot, my eyes goes straight to the description. Why does the photo related to Twilight and stuff like that. But you do look gorgeous in this photo. I'm not sure about the placing of V logo. As for your commercial. I like the fact that you look fresh and beautiful. Very sweet
|
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Lee Kimmel on Mar 13, 2012 8:19:57 GMT -7
Amanda: I'm guessing you tried to pull a Taylor and make your own V cover, but it doesn't look that special. It doesn't have the same effects that Taylor's did - the black and white and the striking nature of it that still resonate with me to this day. The Twilight reference also greatly confuses me, since you're in Glee and, well, there's no beau there. The description is also a bit too large - it does overshadow you, and a striking black and white effect could have helped it. You do look great and fierce, but the V logo through your neck like that is a bit off-putting, and again, that effect could have helped.
The commercial one is genuine, but boring. There's also the problem that the title is plastered over your forehead and your white top blends into the white background. You're almost in camouflage here, and I'm not going to remember this because you don't stand out. You're almost an afterthought here, even if you do look good. If the title had been more proximal, the text wasn't so overwhelming, and the background had more contrast with your top, this could have been fantastic. Instead, I'm writing this and hardly remembering YOU. Which is :/
|
|
|
|
Post by Morgan Freeman on Mar 13, 2012 13:34:10 GMT -7
Morgan: Both of these covers aren't entirely working for me. Your high fashion shot doesn't have anything unique to me that makes me gasp and think "how did she pull that off and look this stunning." The only unique aspect to this cover is your hair (which isn't that unique when I think off all the wacky hairstyles teenagers are pulling off these days). You look kind of disgusted at something in this shot, and the way the V comes up the right side of your face gives you a black line that distorts your right eye a little bit, making your eye look droopy or looks like your make up has ran.
Your commercial shot is cute, you look beautiful and innocent. But the way the text is plastered all over you, you seem to get upstaged by all the advertising . However your eyes look very strong in this shot , you have a little bit of smizing (yeah im down with the lingo) going on here which makes them stand out well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Janice Dickinson on Mar 13, 2012 17:41:19 GMT -7
Janice: I don't know, I kind of like the angle on your high fashion one, and the ways your eyes look there. One thing that's interesting about these photo is that it's the same angle of your face, but you look completely different in both.
|
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Lee Kimmel on Mar 13, 2012 17:48:45 GMT -7
Janice: I don't know, I kind of like the angle on your high fashion one, and the ways your eyes look there. One thing that's interesting about these photo is that it's the same angle of your face, but you look completely different in both. Why are you saying that like it's a bad thing? That's exactly what we wanted... we want to see "both sides" of the models. |
|
|
|
Post by Zooey Deschanel on Mar 13, 2012 22:02:55 GMT -7
Zooey: I'm sorry, but I don't read high fashion from your high fashion shot. I do appreciate the effort, but it's not a dramatic enough shot and the text is also distracting. I do like your commercial shot better. You look beautiful in both, but I like the softness you exude in the commercial shot. It makes you feel more approachable. Janice: I don't know, I kind of like the angle on your high fashion one, and the ways your eyes look there. One thing that's interesting about these photo is that it's the same angle of your face, but you look completely different in both. Why are you saying that like it's a bad thing? That's exactly what we wanted... we want to see "both sides" of the models. I didn't read that as a negative comment at all. Janice was saying that it's interesting that while she had the same angle in both shots, she still managed to look different in both. Janice was complimenting Dianna on that. At least, that's how I took it. |
|
|
|
Post by Janice Dickinson on Mar 13, 2012 22:16:13 GMT -7
That's how it was meant. But I'm not going to sugar coat my critique.
|
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Lee Kimmel on Mar 13, 2012 23:10:15 GMT -7
Okay. My error. Sorry.
|
|
